Both get called "backend platforms," but they operate a level apart. Supabase manages infrastructure primitives — Postgres, auth, storage — and you build your backend out of them. Piezas manages finished business capabilities, and your app (or your AI agent) assembles them. Neither is a knockoff of the other; the honest question is which layer you want to own.
On Supabase, your AI has to knowto write a Postgres exclusion constraint, handle the check-then-insert race, and add an idempotency key so a double-click doesn't create two bookings and two Zoom meetings. Most generated code checks availability, then inserts — and loses the race under load. It works in the demo and fails on the first busy day.
On Piezas, that is simply how the calendar service works: overlap is excluded at the database, creation takes an Idempotency-Key, and a linked Google calendar's busy time is checked server-side. Your agent calls one endpoint.
Plenty of teams use both: Supabase (or any Postgres) for a novel core domain, Piezas for everything around it — the bookings, documents, and billing that every business app needs and no business app is differentiated by.